I very much agree with the posts here. On one hand, I think the PHA dussacks are great for encouraging and building athleticism and the use of distance and timing; on the other hand, because of the floppiness, many of the techniques we see in the sources are simply impossible or will end up with you getting hit or doubling. This lends itself to cut/countercut/void style of fencing we see, with little to no handwork.
The suggestion about the PHA cutlass trainers is one that I am going to be trying out myself; I recently had the chance to bout dussack using their synthetic baskethilt trainers, and I was very pleased with the fact that I could actually parry and perform actions on the blade.
I'm also glad to see that many people are on the same page here; I would love to see the level of technique and understanding of the dussack rise in the community, and I think that having a trainer more suitable for period technique is necessary to achieve that.
